Uponnothing.co.uk

January 11, 2006

Rejecting Diplomacy

Filed under: News, Rant, Iran, Only in America, War — editor @ 2:47 pm

Diplomacy. What does this word actually mean? Is it the process of sorting out national and international problems through rational, peaceful, inclusive, arguments? Or is it the gunboat, or nuclear threat curtailing any arguments against largely Western nuclear hegemony?

Whatever it is in recent times it has been paid largely lip service by Western governments who have already decided on policy, but want to appear that they tried ‘everything they can to avoid using force… blah blah blah’, before sending in the Airforce and destroying yet another Nations sovereignty.

Still, when it comes to ‘other’ nations, i.e. anyone not ‘conducive’ to the continuation of ’stability’ in the Westo-centric vision of American dominance - with the larger EU countries acting as groupies - then they should use diplomcay to resolve all problems, and be grateful if we even give them a chance to talk round a table.

Diplomacy, such as Iran for example, a country that wants nuclear power, something that we will not allow, something about the creation of WMD (this time we are threatening a country when we know they haven’t even made any WMD’s!), yet we don’t really have any evidence of a nuclear missile program. I guess we have to just trust in the governments of the US and UK to provide us with valid, reliable intelligence, surely they wouldn’t lie to us… again… would they?

Well we are about to find out, ‘IAEA Director Mohamed ElBaradei said Iran, which insists its nuclear program is for electricity only, had told his agency it wants to restart centrifuges at Natanz to enrich uranium on a “small scale.”‘ and of course the Western world is up in arms, I mean its not as if we have a nuclear weapons program, or vast stockpiles of them, or that the US is intending to use them (again…) this time in Iran… oh.

The stench of extreme hypocrisy is hard to stomach whenever you read soundbites from the neo-conservative scum that fester in the Whitehouse, and of course this issue is no different:

“They shouldn’t do it because it would really be a sign that they are not prepared to actually make diplomacy work,” Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said last week.

“By cutting the seals, the Iranian leadership shows its disdain for international concern and its rejection of international diplomacy,” Schulte [the US ambassador to the IAEA] said.

Perhaps similiar to the disdain for international concern and diplomacy when you invaded Iraq? Or like the disdain for international concern and diplomacy when you go ahead and nuke Iranian nuclear sites.

Diplomacy. It’s just the stuff that happens whilst you plan the next war.

December 9, 2005

Bush’s Tookie - Remembering Bush’s worst public moment. By Timothy Noah

Filed under: Only in America — editor @ 9:15 am

Bush’s Tookie - Remembering Bush’s worst public moment. By Timothy Noah

October 7, 2005

God, huh, what is he good for?

Filed under: News, Iran, Only in America, War, Iraq — editor @ 9:59 am

Not content with creating thousands of years of religious fueds, he has now inflicted on us a new Jesus: George Bush. Jesus was a son of a carpenter, George is a son of a bitch, but lets hope that the new Jesus meets a similiar fate, and is nailed to a cross within a week. But is it God that is to blame, or are the voices in his head thoseof the devil?

Either way, it is those that applauded Bush’s ridiculous speech are the real evil, may they all burn in hell.

August 16, 2005

Babies Caught Up in ‘No-Fly’ Confusion

Filed under: Rant, Only in America — editor @ 12:00 pm

Babies Caught Up in ‘No-Fly’ Confusion

Only in America…

Sarah Zapolsky and her husband had a[n]… experience last month while departing from Dulles International Airport outside Washington. An airline ticket agent told them their 11-month-old son was on the government list.

They were able to board their flight after ticket agents took a half-hour to fax her son’s passport and fill out paperwork.

“I understand that security is important,” Zapolsky said. “But if they’re just guessing, and we have to give up our passport to prove that our 11-month-old is not a terrorist, it’s a waste of their time.”

Another demonstration on the stupidity of the ’security’ measures taken in the ‘war on terror’. Obviously the complete abandonment of common sense in recent times dictates that even when they see the suspected terrorist is wearing a nappy, dribbling, and unable to speak (or, to coin a phrase ‘Bush-like’), they still have to go through the paperwork.

Powered by WordPress